Measuring the number of unique contributors per topic - benchmark
Conversations can be measured by the number of contributors in each thread (depth of the thread). The absolute number of contributors is not necessarily a reliable measure since it can give you a distorted picture of reality. For example, a thread with 10 comments contributed by 2 people is less valuable than a thread with 10 comments contributed by 4 people. The conversation composed of 4 unique contributors gives a better indication of the sense of community.
When doing our analysis we accounted for the number of unique contributors for a set of communities across our database. The average across the communities is 3.79 unique contributors per topic (including the topic starter). The unique contributors per topic are being calculated on an all time basis, where we calculate the average of unique contributors per community. To strive for an ideal sense of community is it advised to focus on an average amount of unique contributors per topic of 3.5 and above.
When doing our analysis we accounted for the number of unique contributors for a set of communities across our database. The average across the communities is 3.79 unique contributors per topic (including the topic starter). The unique contributors per topic are being calculated on an all time basis, where we calculate the average of unique contributors per community. To strive for an ideal sense of community is it advised to focus on an average amount of unique contributors per topic of 3.5 and above.
How does this benchmark work for support communities?
In my opinion, a topic with 2 contributors and a "best answer" can easily be of high support value; whereas a long, hot topic with 50+ contributors may start to degrade the support value.
In my opinion, a topic with 2 contributors and a "best answer" can easily be of high support value; whereas a long, hot topic with 50+ contributors may start to degrade the support value.
Hey Ditte! :)
I understand what you mean with this. What this KPI is measuring is a bit in conflict with what support communities try to achieve (direct answers, so ideally a low amount of contributions).
Maybe it would make sense to refine this KPI, and exclude all topics which are questions from it?
This way you would only measure actual discussions instead of questions & answers.
Let me know what you are thinking of this, as I am currently working on something related.
Cheers,
Julian
I understand what you mean with this. What this KPI is measuring is a bit in conflict with what support communities try to achieve (direct answers, so ideally a low amount of contributions).
Maybe it would make sense to refine this KPI, and exclude all topics which are questions from it?
This way you would only measure actual discussions instead of questions & answers.
Let me know what you are thinking of this, as I am currently working on something related.
Cheers,
Julian
Cheers,
Ditte
Reply
Sign up
If you ever had a profile with us, there's no need to create another one.
Don't worry if your email address has since changed, or you can't remember your login, just let us know at community@gainsight.com and we'll help you get started from where you left.
Else, please continue with the registration below.
Welcome to the Gainsight Community
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.